ROT OF NEGATIVITY by Ajagu Kenneth Collins

One sunny afternoon as I walked the road leading towards the faculty of social sciences, a car breezed past me at top speed, loud music emanated from the car whilst the occupants laughed loudly. I continued my walk and as I passed two students, I couldn’t help hearing their rather interesting view of what had just happened. Both seemed to believe that whatever money used to buy that car was gotten illegally Like my mood always fluctuates, I decided to turn and head back to New Hall. Just as I walked in, I saw a beautiful couple holding hands and laughing about something, looking absolutely happy together. Again people around seemed to believe  they were committing some abomination (rolls eyes) and were been inappropriate.
Yet again that evening I took a stroll and just by the atm machine at the entrance to New Hall, I bumped into a beautiful girl as she hurriedly brushed me aside..hmmn unapologetically and entered this sleek car..I think it must have been a Toyota.
  Now this is it overtime I have noticed the apparent ability of the average Nigerian mind to be aligned towards the negative line of thoughts.  The question stands : “is there no positivity left in Nigeria”?. Why must the negative side of things be deduced all the time so that the positive  be totally neglected.
  Recently a squabble ensued between my room mates, one of particular interest *”Ukpaka Vincent”: an epitome of a smart Nigerian youth (heightened morality and religious sycophancy)…in his very own words “women shouldn’t be heard in church” even in this century I asked..YES!! He screamed like a person undergoing exorcism, a well learned fellow but yet ignorance; his Achilles hill.
 “Are the positive optimistic ones not yet born?” Lol…. As Chimamanda Adichie said on the TED Platform- “the dangers of a single story are innumerable”.
   I agitate for the infiltration of positivity and optimism into our minds, the ability to derive positivity out of every situation and jettison negativity after all you are what you think! Therefore I say to you UKPAKACIOUS  nigerians, youths can be hardworking and can afford to buy a car, not everyone you see holding hands have necessarily committed fornication, spare a positive judgement for that pretty girl you see entering an older mans car, it was her uncle who has just told her the sad tale of her brothers demise, that young man with dreadlocks could very well be on his way to a modelling photo shoot whose proceeds would serve as his school fees and not to some mischievous, catastrophic purpose.
I leave you with this: YOU yes! YOU
LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL see it as such.

NOTE(*)– the names have been changed for sake of privacy.
TED is an idea platform where world changers share ideas they have.

By Ajagu Kennethcollins aka (limpopojnr) lol.

53 Comments

  1. Judge not so that y’all won’t be judged..dnt distract urself by self righteousness for righteousness z a gift from God..He created nd only HIM can condemn.. Heaven z a personal race..Heb12:14.do d work of an evangelist..
    Nyc write up K.C

    Like

  2. Lol ken, d youths could hav also used rituals or yahoo! Or could jst b dia parent’s car dey’r flaunting… Well, we know New Hall, dey should hold hands in fron of d chapel! As for dat girl, ha parents couldn’t tell her d news shey?lol,pickin ha up at night, u didn’t tell us she was wearin a bumshort nd heels! Its our reality bro *wink*

    Like

    1. Reality is both ways. Never clamour for the negative side before considering the positive. The positive thinking approach to all matters should be called upon…nd wait for otherwise to be the case. Its just so happens that all we see is the negative.

      Like

  3. Deciding to pass ‘judgments’ and conclusions whatsoever without any form of inquiry and merely taking things on the face of it with wild generalizations on the intentions of people we don’t even know at all is quite a funny trait .

    Like

    1. @timi well said….. @jones its safe to cast aspersions in regards to you…why? *with the voice of a wise one* Cus I knw ur roar and huw it sounds. The question is at what stage does my personal opinion affect my attitude towards other people and on the long run ME. What has it reduced me to? A judgemental pessimistic negative man?

      Like

  4. D Nigeria we want/wish for is def nt wah we ve now. Our ‘superiors’ whu we r to look up tu ve shown us dt havin facy cars, moni $ ll is d way tu survive, hence we ve tolled that part. Boys be ‘hustlin’ tu lay their hand on fast moni, get cars control d gals. D gals on d oda hand r onli intrested in guys wit cars $ cash. U can’t tell me dt all d gals seatin in a man’s car are related tu dem $ dey are passin bad news. Na everyday person fam dey die for unilag? Nice piece tho (Y)

    Like

    1. @skinnies its a fact that yes the Leaders have set a negative example….but do we then murder chilvary rather than pray its just at rest and hope positively that it awakes soonest..

      Like

      1. @Ken. To be very honest with you, it is until a set of new leaders arise dt all dis wld stop. By dis, I dnt mean APC or any merger or even d hilarious new PDM or waheva dey r called. I mean a new generation of u $ I whu r gonna set d roght part for peeps tu follow. Till den, Goodluck tu us

        Like

  5. @all: wonder why none has deemed it fit to inquire into the identity of the notoriously-selfrighteously-pretentiously negative ‘Ukpaka Vincent’! I happen to be his intimate friend, and for our sports, (and Ken’s justification), I wish he could step into this colloquy and give us a measure of his virile remonstrance…
    Caveat: Beware you don’t fall for the potency of his logic!

    Like

  6. all having being said…1st guys were probably y boys(u will not drive ur fadas car like dat if u hav 2 account 4 it or if u worked hard to buy it…go n c how agbodesi drives his car)
    girl n guy holding hands…yea after nacking theres usually hightened intimacy n closeness n d last babe na aristo. finish!!! u knw I knw n God knows. *dusts hand* theres a name for it when u become overly optimistic and start ignoring reality…its called naivety. no quarell

    Like

  7. @Pendragon the premises of your conclusions are weak and insufficient enough to infer such conclusions, are there no children of very wealthy people who can live in such a manner as the first boy, why turn to a busy body over such matters that need not concern you

    Like

    1. na wa o. did I not say no quarell? it seems this one doant understand english at night. first of all they my opinion. n how does it not concern me but concerns u. its an article n am a human being who can articulate therefore its my business so stfu n go back to ur nightmares. its past ur bedtime anyway. all these kids b awake n trying to bite off more than they can chew wen dey should b un or semi conscious

      Like

  8. who says these people arent the ones who are ‘naive’ regarding the implication of their actions knowing they have such ‘wise’ and observant people around them and still acting in such manner

    Like

  9. Surely not caring at all (or not giving a f***) about what any one thought or for being generally accepted and respected for acting properly is one remarkable character of great achievers in history now isnt it Mr Pendragon

    Like

    1. oh no dear. if f***s were giving so many things would not have been done. I mean here we are talking about negative opininions being the order of the day. just shrugg em off get the freak on with wat u have to. if f***s were given, blacks would still be slaves walt disney would never have been formed and ben afleck would have signed down from being batman…n oh vic o is still at it. u see. only opinion people should give f***s about are mine.

      Like

  10. offcourse even by your comments it is easy to see you are all wise and all knowing surely nobody’s opinion is of more or even similar relevance

    Like

  11. @ken, perfect piece of architectural contructive word selection put together. There is no doubt you are already soaring higher above your equals. Thumbs up bro. More of this.

    Like

  12. I AM HIGHLY COMPELLD 2 ENTER DIS ARENA OF TONGUE LASHIN BEING D ONLY CMENTATOR WT A LOCUS STANDI 2 SPEAK ON DIS ISSUE…
    FIRST OF ALL, MR KEN,B4 I START 2 UNDRESS U N’ NAKED PIECE, LET ME UNVEIL D IDENTITY OF DIS GROSSLY MISUNDASTOOD UKPAKACIOUS VINCENT, HE IS ME…UBAKA VICTOR…NO REGRET ON D IMBALANCD, BADLY REPORTED SPEECH CREDITID 2 ME, AS A MATA OF FAKTLY,I AV ADRESD DIS ON MY FBUK TYMLYN IN RSPNS 2 HON. AJAGU’S POST..
    MR AJAGU PAINTS ME AS RETROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED *nt sycofant*AND A PERSONIFICATION OF ALL DAT IS PESSIMIST JUST BCZ I SUPOZEDLY DU NT SEE ANYTIN GUD OR POSITIVE IN D WORLD…
    Dis is awfuly amusin n ridiculous givn d various scenarios in his ‘travelogue’ nd his warpd telepathetic inteprtatn of my perspective on d issue…
    Mr LIMPOPO,YEAH,DATS HIS PETNAME. LIKE I SAID AFORE,I AV NT REPRESNTID 2 U WEDA DIRECTLY OR IMPLICTLY D WILD CONCLUSIONS U PRESENTID HERE…NT AT ALL…
    ON D TROUSER ISSUE…
    LET ME SCHOOL U A BIT, I RMEMBA VIVIDLY D ENTIRE LASTFLOOR ENIJOKU STAYLITES WERE IN OUR PRECIOUS RUM WHEN WE HAD DIS INTELIGENT DISCUSION ALBDIT DEBATE,…ND PLZ ODA CMENTATORS READ MY LANGUAGE CNTEXTUALY N CLEARLY B4 U DISPLAY UR UNSIGHTLY BUTTS…DAT D PRY PURPOZE WHY WE AV CLOTHES 2DAY,IS 2 COVER OUR NAKEDNES, ND AS SOCIETY CHANGES,CLOTHES BEGAN 2 BE LUKD UPON AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DIFRENTIATIN D ‘SEXES’,….WHY,INORDER 2 MAKE 4 A SANE AND DECENT SOCIETY…U WIL BE A GOAT,NT U LIMPOPO,2 DENY DAT CLOTHES NOW IDENTIFY PPLE,THEIR DISCIPLINE,ND EVN INFLUENCES D WAY WE ADRES DEM…IF IT GOES AS FAR AS DAT,CMONSENSE DKTATS DAT THER HAS 2 BE A BGININ POINT,WHICH IS D DIFRENTIATION OF D SEXES…DAT IS WHY, A MAN CANOT PUT ON A BRA,GSTRNG,LPGLOS,SKIRT,HIGH HEEL, N LUK DECENT OR ANY SANER DAN A DERANGED ‘KOLOMENTAL’,,.I DU NT AV 2 GO D PATH OF S6CIOLOGY BT UR PALPABLE IGNORANCE WIL LET ME…
    NOW TRANSPOZE DIS THOT 2 DEUT22vl

    Like

  13. pto
    deut 22v5 dat renders any male clothin wearin female an anathema 2 God…nd ask urslf,why dId God pen dat down thru moses? Rmemba,israel had just bin deliverd 4rm over 400yrs of ejyptian servitude n slavery widin which tymframe ,they were unfortunate enf 2 av outstandinly assimiliated d culture,blifs rites de passage,rituals,religion nd oda ‘cosmogonous’ paraphenalia includin human sacrifice unique 2 ejyptian way of life….infakt d entire torah IS predominantly designd by ELOHIM 2 divest israel of dat identity n give her her own cultural,religous n social idntity which stil stnds 2 dis day…making israel d only nation pozesin d knwldg of d true GOD AT DAT TYM….why dnt u call it ethnocentsism or GOD NOT SEEIN ANYTIN POSTIV IN EJYPT!

    Does nature itslf nt teach yu dat,d physiology of a woman in its created form is VISIBLY SENSUAL ND SEXUALY APPEALIN? WHAT THEN, DOES D TROUSER SERVE? IT SIMPLY EMPHASIZES DISTASTEFULY HER CONTOURS N PARABOLIC BAKSIDE…IS DAT DECENCY??WHY DU U TINK WE AV SEXUALY INCONTINENT MEN RAVAGIN DERERVIN SKIMPILY DREZD WMEN..BY D WAY,IF U CITE COUNTRIES WT D TROUSER CULTURE,I WIL STIL NID 2 RMIND U DAT XTIANITY IS NT UR CULTURE IF U AR 2 BE AN ADHERENT.AND DAT WHERE UR CULTURE IS VISIBLY INCONSISTENT WT BIBLE, IT IS A NULLITY! ….OFCOZ U’LL SAY DAT D TROUSERS AR SPECIALY MADE 4 WMEN…IF U AR REVELATID ENF, U SHUD KNW D OBJECTIVE OF SATAN IS NT DAT spECIALY MAde TROUSErs BE made 2 COVER nakedns But 2 rEVEAL same WiT A COSMETIC COVERING.

    Like

  14. wake up…satan’s smarter dan yu…
    Let me corekt u, If u undstnd n acept dat indvduals ar products of the nature of their envrnmt, u wil nt be adresin d totality of Nigerian youths wit d word ‘SHUD’ BCZ WHAT U PREACHIN AR MERE IDEALS CAPABLE OF ACHIEVMNT NOT A UNIVERSAL CONSTANT!
    @TIMI…FUNYTRAIT INDEED…

    Like

  15. Mr ken, du u undstnd dat u ar liable for grossly msrepresntin my cments wit appallin negligence as 2 d acuracy of info cntaind in ur deficient article…
    @Skinnies,fine respnse…
    @pendragon…yes sir…tel Ken dat b4 d great deluge in Noah’s tym, d perishd lot of undiscernin humanity were 2 too positive minded 2 avert their mind 2 d salvational mesag of Noah nd d impendin Acquatic doom….
    @ogbeche …hmm.
    @Omenga…always on d fence wit extra matchstik 2 stoke d literary fire!!
    I entreat u,’come down 4rm thy fence’4 d angels wilt take charge if thou tumblest….

    I AM NO CONSERVATIVE,BIGOT SYCOPHANT, PESSIMIST, D PRBLM LIES IN D ABSOLUTE N HISTORICALY PROVEN FACT ,DAT THE WORLD HATE TRUTH….BUT AS JOHN HUSS OF BOHEMIA WILL SAY ”TRUTH CONQUERS ALL”….D FACT DAT U DISAGREE DONT MAKE IT A LIE…ISRAEL REJECTED HER MESSIAH,BT DAT DINT MAKE CHRIST ANY LESS DAN WHAT GOD MADE HIM–THE SAVIOUR….
    **FIGHT THAT**

    Like

  16. .@Ken,why dont u tell ur frnds hw dat name limpopo stuckd?
    In igbo…”Ikpom ukpaka,
    a kpom ghi limpopo”
    ELIJAH A MANROGHWU ELISHA…I HOP U UNDSTND DAT…
    LSS KWENU!
    UNILAG KWEZUENU…
    GOD BLES Y’ALL

    Like

  17. Now I may feel at ease to attempt to step down ‘from the fence’, coward that I am! At least we are sure whom we are talking about, my most controversial friend and personal critic, Mr Victor Ubaka. He is not one of your con artists hiding behind pennames to escape liability and censor – he is out in the open with his tentacles waving in all direction. I may venture to say (but not conceding) that even if we don’t like his comments, at least we respect the logicalness of his remarks…
    A word for those who might misunderstand him: his strong-worded attack on the article is by no means any indication of his personal odium for the writer – and surely Limpopo Junior knows this.
    Due eulogies and apologies rendered, I think it only fit to make my own little assertion which is, boldly stated, that I AM OF THAT NEGATIVE MOLD OF WHICH UBAKA IS ACCUSED. MY ANACHRONISM IS CHRONIC. You needn’t pardon me, but at least understand my comments…
    I agree wholly with Ubaka: clothing is meant to hide nakedness, not to accentuate it. Believe it or not, some forms of female apparel are more seductive than outright nakedness. We may try to hide behind modernity, but howsoever we conceal our eyes, we feel that public opprobrium which never fails to assert itself whenever we cross that moral boundary dictated by public opinion.
    I’d like to repeat Ubaka’s punchline: the devil is smart. You think he will keep coming in dark, unearthly veil to tempt us? Wherefore the reason for the tocsin in 2 Cor 11.14: ‘And no wonder, for Satan keeps transforming himself into an angel of light’? He comes to us in his country-bumpkin disguise and feeds us with reasons to veer from the path of nature…
    @Boy and girl holding hands: It is not pessimism to assume that the worst is going on; it is only being realistic. Let us face the fact: two don’t walk together unless by agreement. Nature has made us(wisely I think) to be mutually attracted and repulsed by the opposite sex, depending on the relationship we have with them. And truth be told, it is insulting the maturity of the ‘negative minded ones’ to insinuate that they scoff at mere holding hands: we all understand that there are different types of holding hands, each with its level of intimacy, and to my observation, the public is only offended at that intimate and possessive fondling which only deep emotion could evoke.
    But supposing even that those displays of affection are entirely harmless, it is only fair to adopt the accusatorial system here and assume the worst until our assumption is rebutted. I ask: how many times have such assumptions not been confirmed rather than rebutted?
    @ Pendragon: your comments are sometimes like pearls in the nose of a pig: you shroud them with so much filth that we hardly see the gem you are offering – no aspersion intended…
    @Wayword: O yes, thanks for pointing that out. If, as Mr Stephen puts it, rendering opinions as to what we see means judging, how may we accept the good and shun the bad?
    Finally, I make a concession that it can be very unjust to ‘judge’ without getting details, yet I hold that holding that defensive stance can scare the ‘smart devil’ a little, if he must come to us at all….
    @Ubaka: thanks for coming in, to clear the nebulous indecisions….

    Like

  18. A word for those who might misunderstand him: his strong-worded attack on the article is by no means any indication of his personal odium for the writer – and surely Limpopo Junior knows this.
    Due eulogies and apologies rendered, I think it only fit to make my own little assertion which is, boldly stated, that I AM OF THAT NEGATIVE MOLD OF WHICH UBAKA IS ACCUSED. MY ANACHRONISM IS CHRONIC. You needn’t pardon me, but at least understand my comments…
    I agree wholly with Ubaka: clothing is meant to hide nakedness, not to accentuate it. Believe it or not, some forms of female apparel are more seductive than outright nakedness. We may try to hide behind modernity, but howsoever we conceal our eyes, we feel that public opprobrium which never fails to assert itself whenever we cross that moral boundary dictated by public opinion.
    I’d like to repeat Ubaka’s punchline: the devil is smart. You think he will keep coming in dark, unearthly veil to tempt us? Wherefore the reason for the tocsin in 2 Cor 11.14: ‘And no wonder, for Satan keeps transforming himself into an angel of light’? He comes to us in his country-bumpkin disguise and feeds us with reasons to veer from the path of nature…
    @Boy and girl holding hands: It is not pessimism to assume that the worst is going on; it is only being realistic. Let us face the fact: two don’t walk together unless by agreement. Nature has made us(wisely I think) to be mutually attracted and repulsed by the opposite sex, depending on the relationship we have with them. And truth be told, it is insulting the maturity of the ‘negative minded ones’ to insinuate that they scoff at mere holding hands: we all understand that there are different types of holding hands, each with its level of intimacy, and to my observation, the public is only offended at that intimate and possessive fondling which only deep emotion could evoke.
    But supposing even that those displays of affection are entirely harmless, it is only fair to adopt the accusatorial system here and assume the worst until our assumption is rebutted. I ask: how many times have such assumptions not been confirmed rather than rebutted?
    @ Pendragon: your comments are sometimes like pearls in the nose of a pig: you shroud them with so much filth that we hardly see the gem you are offering – no aspersion intended…
    @Wayword: O yes, thanks for pointing that out. If, as Mr Stephen puts it, rendering opinions as to what we see means judging, how may we accept the good and shun the bad?
    Finally, I make a concession that it can be very unjust to ‘judge’ without getting details, yet I hold that holding that defensive stance can scare the ‘smart devil’ a little, if he must come to us at all….
    @Ubaka: thanks for coming in, to clear the nebulous indecisions….

    Like

  19. You needn’t pardon me, but at least understand my comments…
    I agree wholly with Ubaka: clothing is meant to hide nakedness, not to accentuate it. Believe it or not, some forms of female apparel are more seductive than outright nakedness. We may try to hide behind modernity, but howsoever we conceal our eyes, we feel that public opprobrium which never fails to assert itself whenever we cross that moral boundary dictated by public opinion.
    I’d like to repeat Ubaka’s punchline: the devil is smart. You think he will keep coming in dark, unearthly veil to tempt us? Wherefore the reason for the tocsin in 2 Cor 11.14: ‘And no wonder, for Satan keeps transforming himself into an angel of light’? He comes to us in his country-bumpkin disguise and feeds us with reasons to veer from the path of nature…
    @Boy and girl holding hands: It is not pessimism to assume that the worst is going on; it is only being realistic. Let us face the fact: two don’t walk together unless by agreement. Nature has made us(wisely I think) to be mutually attracted and repulsed by the opposite sex, depending on the relationship we have with them. And truth be told, it is insulting the maturity of the ‘negative minded ones’ to insinuate that they scoff at mere holding hands: we all understand that there are different types of holding hands, each with its level of intimacy, and to my observation, the public is only offended at that intimate and possessive fondling which only deep emotion could evoke.
    But supposing even that those displays of affection are entirely harmless, it is only fair to adopt the accusatorial system here and assume the worst until our assumption is rebutted. I ask: how many times have such assumptions not been confirmed rather than rebutted?
    @ Pendragon: your comments are sometimes like pearls in the nose of a pig: you shroud them with so much filth that we hardly see the gem you are offering – no aspersion intended…
    @Wayword: O yes, thanks for pointing that out. If, as Mr Stephen puts it, rendering opinions as to what we see means judging, how may we accept the good and shun the bad?
    Finally, I make a concession that it can be very unjust to ‘judge’ without getting details, yet I hold that holding that defensive stance can scare the ‘smart devil’ a little, if he must come to us at all….
    @Ubaka: thanks for coming in, to clear the nebulous indecisions….

    Like

  20. I’d like to repeat Ubaka’s punchline: the devil is smart. You think he will keep coming in dark, unearthly veil to tempt us? Wherefore the reason for the tocsin in 2 Cor 11.14: ‘And no wonder, for Satan keeps transforming himself into an angel of light’? He comes to us in his country-bumpkin disguise and feeds us with reasons to veer from the path of nature…
    @Boy and girl holding hands: It is not pessimism to assume that the worst is going on; it is only being realistic. Let us face the fact: two don’t walk together unless by agreement. Nature has made us(wisely I think) to be mutually attracted and repulsed by the opposite sex, depending on the relationship we have with them. And truth be told, it is insulting the maturity of the ‘negative minded ones’ to insinuate that they scoff at mere holding hands: we all understand that there are different types of holding hands, each with its level of intimacy, and to my observation, the public is only offended at that intimate and possessive fondling which only deep emotion could evoke.
    But supposing even that those displays of affection are entirely harmless, it is only fair to adopt the accusatorial system here and assume the worst until our assumption is rebutted. I ask: how many times have such assumptions not been confirmed rather than rebutted?
    @ Pendragon: your comments are sometimes like pearls in the nose of a pig: you shroud them with so much filth that we hardly see the gem you are offering – no aspersion intended…
    @Wayword: O yes, thanks for pointing that out. If, as Mr Stephen puts it, rendering opinions as to what we see means judging, how may we accept the good and shun the bad?
    Finally, I make a concession that it can be very unjust to ‘judge’ without getting details, yet I hold that holding that defensive stance can scare the ‘smart devil’ a little, if he must come to us at all….
    @Ubaka: thanks for coming in, to clear the nebulous indecisions….

    Like

  21. @Boy and girl holding hands: It is not pessimism to assume that the worst is going on; it is only being realistic. Let us face the fact: two don’t walk together unless by agreement. Nature has made us(wisely I think) to be mutually attracted and repulsed by the opposite sex, depending on the relationship we have with them. And truth be told, it is insulting the maturity of the ‘negative minded ones’ to insinuate that they scoff at mere holding hands: we all understand that there are different types of holding hands, each with its level of intimacy, and to my observation, the public is only offended at that intimate and possessive fondling which only deep emotion could evoke.
    But supposing even that those displays of affection are entirely harmless, it is only fair to adopt the accusatorial system here and assume the worst until our assumption is rebutted. I ask: how many times have such assumptions not been confirmed rather than rebutted?
    @ Pendragon: your comments are sometimes like pearls in the nose of a pig: you shroud them with so much filth that we hardly see the gem you are offering – no aspersion intended…
    @Wayword: O yes, thanks for pointing that out. If, as Mr Stephen puts it, rendering opinions as to what we see means judging, how may we accept the good and shun the bad?
    Finally, I make a concession that it can be very unjust to ‘judge’ without getting details, yet I hold that holding that defensive stance can scare the ‘smart devil’ a little, if he must come to us at all….
    @Ubaka: thanks for coming in, to clear the nebulous indecisions….

    Like

  22. But supposing even that those displays of affection are entirely harmless, it is only fair to adopt the accusatorial system here and assume the worst until our assumption is rebutted. I ask: how many times have such assumptions not been confirmed rather than rebutted?
    @ Pendragon: your comments are sometimes like pearls in the nose of a pig: you shroud them with so much filth that we hardly see the gem you are offering – no aspersion intended…
    @Wayword: O yes, thanks for pointing that out. If, as Mr Stephen puts it, rendering opinions as to what we see means judging, how may we accept the good and shun the bad?
    Finally, I make a concession that it can be very unjust to ‘judge’ without getting details, yet I hold that holding that defensive stance can scare the ‘smart devil’ a little, if he must come to us at all….
    @Ubaka: thanks for coming in, to clear the nebulous indecisions….

    Like

  23. @Wayword: O yes, thanks for pointing that out. If, as Mr Stephen puts it, rendering opinions as to what we see means judging, how may we accept the good and shun the bad?
    Finally, I make a concession that it can be very unjust to ‘judge’ without getting details, yet I hold that holding that defensive stance can scare the ‘smart devil’ a little, if he must come to us at all….
    @Ubaka: thanks for coming in, to clear the nebulous indecisions….

    Like

    1. Once again @ubaka u have only shown ur folly. A name wasn’t mentioned and ur apparent speed at assuming the role of my character is alarming……

      Like

      1. ahhhh. @ubaka u knw am really fuckin damn well feeling all u say.
        @ajagu dat dosnt mean am against u o. m wit u too bro(to play d omenga fence sitting card he used to play previously. lmao)
        @omenga lol my chairman…my oga. u knw everyone has a flaw. that’s just mine. or maybe I’m doing it on purpose…part of d act. *wink* I just think normal n polite speech is boring. hope the smart devil hasnt got 2 me with that. lmaooo.
        @all looki here a pitched battle is going on and I didnt even know. smtgs wrong with my gmail notifications.

        since we r all here lemme talk abt smth else. I was talkin to d admin recently abt creating an lss blog/writers award 2 encourage writers n promote s art. wat thinkest thou penheads of that?

        Like

  24. .@ken….d whole world knws….u particularly referin 2 MOI…what a joke…U DINT LYK MY ‘UNDESERVING PRESENCE’…BUT DAT SHUD MAKE U GET UR FAKT STRAIT B4 U PASS UR MSG..
    HW’S CLASSIC FM!
    @JOSHUA OMENGA…I CANOT QUIT BAPTIZIN U WIT DESERVIN ENCOMIUMS…I AV A LOT 2 LEARN 4RM YU…
    @AJAGUN…OBJECTIVLY APPRAISIN UR PIECE ON FORM AND CONTENT,I?D GIVE U A 69 outta hundred …great piece for u coz u ar an emergin literary fiction afficionado…i indeed celebr8 u.,

    Like

  25. wt cn i say tumbs up dude 4 years ago u wre no wre near dis bt i ges it is long enuf 2 change ur lif,hp u mke a great SAN smeday kip it up

    Like

  26. ahhhh. @ubaka u knw am really fuckin damn well feeling all u say.
    @ajagu dat dosnt mean am against u o. m wit u too bro(to play d omenga fence sitting card he used to play previously. lmao)
    @omenga lol my chairman…my oga. u knw everyone has a flaw. that’s just mine. or maybe I’m doing it on purpose…part of d act. *wink* I just think normal n polite speech is boring. hope the smart devil hasnt got 2 me with that. lmaooo.
    @all looki here a pitched battle is going on and I didnt even know. smtgs wrong with my gmail notifications.

    since we r all here lemme talk abt smth else. I was talkin to d admin recently abt creating an lss blog/writers award 2 encourage writers n promote s art. wat thinkest thou penheads of that?

    Like

    1. @ubaka show the culprit the evidence and watch his reaction…….I’m yet to know why you assumed this mystical role of my character….hmmmn suprised…but no I’m not…..you have yet shown the similarities u share with my character by suddenly assuming I’m an emerging writer..so much for been positive…..the writers here would attest to the fact that writing is like breakfast for me “incase u dint get the simile….its smethng I’ve been doing since forever”. You wouldn’t know that considering I haven’t happened upon any limerick from you talkless of a writeup.
      @Aderiye I geuss so. People improve.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s